Sean “Diddy” Combs is facing one of the most consequential chapters of his career after being convicted on two counts tied to transporting individuals for prostitution. With sentencing set for next month, the hip-hop mogul is mounting an aggressive appeal, pressing for either a new trial or an outright acquittal.

In filings reported by TMZ, Diddy’s attorneys argue that the prosecution’s case leans on an antiquated reading of the Mann Act, first passed in 1910. They contend that the term “prostitute” then referred specifically to women engaged in sex outside of marriage, a definition far narrower than what courts apply today. By revisiting the law’s origins, the defense hopes to chip away at the foundation of the jury’s decision.

The team has also challenged prosecutors’ claims about the nature of Diddy’s financial ties to the men central to the case. He maintains that any payments were for time and companionship, not sexual services. It is an argument aimed squarely at the heart of the allegations and one that could carry weight as his lawyers push for leniency.

Source